Modern business strategies must include the creation of mobile applications. Businesses in the early days of mobile apps had to decide whether to construct a native app or a web app. However, hybrid app development is now an alternative. Businesses must examine the advantages and disadvantages of each style of app development before choosing one.

Native App Development

Building an app that is only intended for a single platform, such as Android or iOS, is known as native app development. The optimum user experience is provided by native programs, which can fully utilize all platform features, including the camera, GPS, and other hardware. In addition to working offline, native apps are faster than online or hybrid apps.


  • Best user experience: Compared to online or hybrid apps, native apps have a high level of polish and can provide a smoother, more responsive user experience.
  • High performance: Since native apps are created specifically for a platform, they may utilize all of the hardware available in the device.
  • Access to hardware features: Native apps have access to the device’s hardware components, including the camera, GPS, and sensors.


  • Expensive and time-consuming: It is more expensive and time-consuming than other solutions because it necessitates distinct development teams for each platform.
  • Limited reach: Because native apps may only be used on the platform for which they were designed, companies must develop separate apps in order to target each device.
  • App store approval: The need for native apps to receive app store approval can delay the introduction of new features or bug fixes.

Hybrid App Development

Building an app using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and wrapping it in a native container is known as hybrid app development. This preserves some of the advantages of native development while enabling the app to be delivered across several platforms.


  • Cost-effectiveness: Because developers can employ web technologies that they are already familiar with, It is less expensive than native app development.
  • Cross-platform: By developing hybrid apps only once and deploying them on several platforms, time and effort are saved.
  • Faster development: Since businesses just need to create one app rather than different apps for each platform, hybrid app development is quicker than native app development.


  • Performance problems: Because hybrid apps must operate in a web view, they sometimes execute less quickly than native apps.
  • Limited access to hardware features: In comparison to native apps, hybrid apps may have less access to hardware functionalities.
  • User experience: Native apps may provide a better user experience overall than hybrid apps.

Instagram is a perfect example of a successful native app; it has separate iOS and Android apps. The native apps provide a fluid and responsive user interface and fully utilize the hardware capabilities of each platform. Another illustration is Snapchat, which offers both a native iOS app and a hybrid Android app. Because the Android app uses web technologies in a native container, some users have complained that it performs slowly and that the user experience isn’t as smooth.

BizFodge can support you if you’re thinking about creating a mobile app for your business. Our team of skilled developers can assist you in weighing the benefits and drawbacks of hybrid and native app development and can walk you through the steps of creating a fruitful mobile application. To find out more about how we can assist your company in thriving in the mobile market, get in touch with us today.

In conclusion, there are benefits and drawbacks to both native and hybrid app development. In the end, it depends on the particular requirements and objectives of the company. Before choosing a choice, take into account variables including the budget, timeframe, target market and necessary functionality.